The Little Ice Age makes it very easy to understand the problems that Tapidaor/Navarro face in trying to create a working model. Not only does the model have to take into account the science of climate change, with varying temperatures and how it affects ecosystems (animals, their environment, and their habitats), but also how the change in temperature effects human behavior. Since because of the scientific advances we have made for. ourselves, we tend to think of modern human society as outside of the Earth's climate. Since its a lot easier to turn down the thermostat rather then to think about why its getting hotter. But before that, earlier humans had to think about why, or rather WHO was causing their discomfort. This thinking lead to change which effected human societies, so that confirms and enforces the idea that the climate and its changes effects the sociosphere of human societies one way or another. So I think the little ice age is a great way to communicate climate history, because it has the two effects that come out of it. Exo and Endo-genous outcomes, where endogenous focus on how societal decisions let society become vulnerable to climate change. Like how Nobels can withhold food from the lower-class causing a famine. While exogenous is focused on how external climate events can overwhelm societies ability to adapt (outpacing it), like a giant freeze that kills a year's worth of crops. Both are key in the outcome that came from the Little Ice Age, both play a key in how we can identify how climate affects our society, and how our society effects the climate.